Past research has identified deficits in knowledge of student teachers regarding integration of technology in teaching leading to a need to investigate the efficacy of teacher training initiatives. There is a gap in understanding of developmental trajectories of these skills, as well as whether other factors moderate this. Using the TPACK-Model, the current study presents an analysis (N = 526) of a teacher training at a University of Education in Germany. Overall, results suggest trajectories where some knowledge domains are positively associated with study progress while others are not. Specifically, technology-related knowledge mostly does not show an association with study progress. However, this phenomenon is moderated by gender, suggesting that women report lower skills in technology-related dimensions and no associations with study progress. Our results illustrate the necessity to improve teacher training so that preservice teachers in general, but especially women, feel better qualified to integrate technology into the classroom.

As cancer continues to be a significant global health challenge, the education of oncology professionals plays a crucial role in providing quality cancer care and achieving optimal patient outcomes. In order to meet the growing need for flexible, accessible, and effective training, this study examines the role of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) in the education of oncology medical professionals. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review included 34 articles published between 2012 and 2022 in EBSCO and PubMed databases. Findings reveal a diverse range of digital tools being used in oncology training, despite a shortage of advanced educational technologies and limited functional improvement compared to traditional instruction. Since the training primarily targeted at multiple professions in the medical expert role, with radiation oncologists being overrepresented, other oncology domains should be examined more thoroughly in the future, taking into account distinct professional abilities, e.g. communication, collaboration, and leadership skills with reference to the CanMEDS framework. Although the training programmes generally resulted in positive outcomes according to the Kirkpatrick evaluation model, experimental research designs were rather limited. Therefore, the substantial contribution and limitations of TEL in oncology education need to be clarified. Precise reporting of digital tools and instructional processes, as well as challenges encountered, is highly recommended to increase transparency and replicability. Research methodology in digital oncology education remains a major concern and should be addressed accordingly in future research.

Providing and receiving feedback requires a certain openness in individuals which is referred to as feedback orientation. Although this openness is also required in peer-feedback processes personal factors that influence student’s openness (i.e. peer-feedback orientation) are less researched. Inspired by feedback orientation studies in a workplace setting we investigated personal factors that influence students’ peer-feedback orientation. As part of an exploratory sequential mixed methods research design, qualitative data on personal factors influencing student’s peer-feedback orientation was collected. Semi-structured interviews with students, teachers and researchers (N = 13) revealed a broad range of personal factors influencing their peer-feedback orientation. Thematic analyses of the data showed that the most prominent factors were related to the perceived usefulness of receiving and providing peer-feedback, the social bond between students, fairness and skills. The importance of existing feedback orientation dimensions (utility, accountability, social awareness and self-efficacy) by (Linderbaum and Levy, Journal of Management 36:1372–1405, 2010) was confirmed in a higher education setting. Interestingly, different interpretations of the dimensions were found which should lead to the development of a peer-feedback orientation scale for higher education.

Das Konzept der Zukunftskompetenzen wird aktuell für Hochschulen als eine Option gesehen, um Studierende besser auf eine ungewisse Zukunft vorzubereiten und diese zu Problemlösern der Zukunft auszubilden. Dabei verwundert es, dass das Konzept den Eingang in die politische Förderaktivitäten gefunden hat, ohne dass eine evidenzbasierte Analyse und eine kritische Diskussion des Konzeptes stattgefunden hat. In diesem Beitrag wird die Diskussion in einen historischen Zusammenhang eingeordnet und es werden Verbindungen zu vergleichbaren Konzepten und Aktivitäten hergestellt. Auf Basis von systematischen Literaturanalysen und Evidenzsynthesen wird der aktuelle Forschungsstand zusammengefasst und 9 Problembereiche bei der Diskussion und Förderung von Zukunftskompetenzen identifiziert. Neben der fehlenden Einordnung der Zukunftskompetenzen in frühere Ansätze wurden vor allem die fehlenden empirischen Grundlagen sowie das Nicht- Vorhandensein von Messemethoden zur Analyse dieser Kompetenzen als kritisch für die Förderung von Lernangeboten für Zukunftskompetenzen identifiziert. Als alternative Forschungs- und Entwicklungsrichtung wird die Herausforderung des Transfers innerhalb und ausserhalb von Expertisefeldern diskutiert.